Find what's
wrong in the
code you wrote.
Traditional SAST tools flood your backlog with thousands of findings, most of which are false positives or unreachable dead code. 00felix scans your first-party code, traces whether user-controlled input can actually reach each vulnerable function, and validates every finding with AI before it becomes a ticket. Only real, reachable, exploitable vulnerabilities make it through.
Vulnerabilities in
the code you ship.
00felix performs static analysis directly on your source code across Java, JavaScript, Python, and .NET, without instrumentation, without agents, and without production access. It parses the abstract syntax tree of every file and traces data flows through your functions, classes, and modules to identify where unsanitized data can reach dangerous operations.
Every finding is anchored to the exact file, class, and line number where the vulnerability exists, not a vague category. SQL injection in UserRepository.java at line 84 is a different finding from SQL injection in OrderService.java at line 211, and 00felix treats them that way.
Every class of vulnerability
in your own code.
user-controlled HTTP query param
passed unmodified, no sanitization
id concatenated into query string
raw SQL execution with tainted input
Trace every path from user input to vulnerable function.
00felix builds a taint flow graph of your entire codebase. Every source of user-controlled input (HTTP parameters, request bodies, headers, file uploads, environment variables) is marked as tainted. 00felix then follows that taint through every function call, assignment, and branch until it either reaches a dangerous sink or is sanitized.
If user-controlled input cannot reach the vulnerable function, the finding is deprioritized. Most raw SAST findings fail this test. Only findings where a real user, sending a real request, can trigger the vulnerability are surfaced.
Tainted doesn't always mean exploitable.
AI validates the difference.
Taint analysis tells you that user input can reach a dangerous function. It doesn't tell you whether the specific input path is actually exposed to an untrusted caller, or whether there's existing validation logic in another layer that 00felix's static view can't see. 00felix runs an AI validation pass on every tainted finding to evaluate real-world exploitability: is this endpoint publicly reachable? Does the input get validated at the API layer before it arrives here? Is there an ORM or prepared statement one layer above that the raw query below it never actually executes with user data?
Findings that clear AI validation are confirmed and queued for fixing. Findings that don't are dismissed with a specific, readable reason, not silently dropped, not sent to a black hole. Every decision is visible and can be overridden.
From source code to
confirmed finding in one pass.
Now it fixes it.
Find out what's actually
exploitable in code you wrote.
Run 00felix SAST on any GitHub repo in minutes.
No setup. No sales call. No credit card.
